Deconstructing Hollywood Mind-Control : Melbourne Indymedia

Subliminal Propaganda Sleazes Onto The Big Screen

Edison may have invented the 'motion picture' - but Jewish immigrants from Europe created Hollywood. (Read 'How The Jews Invented Hollywood' by Neal Gabler) Remarkably, in the century since Meyer, the Warner Brothers and a handful of other Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants who began the 'studio system', Hollywood maintains a distinctly Yiddish accent. Some critics, however, posit that Hollywood doesn't play fair, since it employs the mesmerizing power of cinema to manipulate the mindset of complacent viewers. How? By relentlessly injecting sordid scenarios and denigrating images of once-respected American archetypes and institutions. Current targets: the Catholic Church and , as usual, Arabs.

One very recent example out of many is the comic-book styled action film "Sin City." Here, many of the villains are sporting multiple crucifixion crosses, a symbol held sacred by many Christians, and mixed in with a smattering of swastikas. Indeed, the film's arch-villain turns out to be a satanic, cannibalistic Catholic cardinal! OK, this is fictional 'entertainment' but Hollywood knows these scenarios have a visceral, even subliminal, impact. That's basically why we don't see any Hollywood-fabricated demons and bad guys sporting a Star of David nor do we see any rabid psychopathic rabbis dished up for popular entertainment.

The unspoken code of Tinseltown is simple: Jewish archetypes and Jewish religious sensitivities are to be respected. Others may be casually smeared.

Although Catholics and Arabs are expected to survive this non-lethal, but inherently pernicious onslaught, considering the laudatory treatment Hollywood's Jews regularly heap upon themselves when portraying their brethren, it's becoming a bit of an outrage, as it should. How is it that Jews, Arabs and Christians receive such different treatment under Hollywood's gaze?

In polite terms, the Jewish presence in American film and media is "without peer."

Hollywood is an insider business. While talent is essential, there is a political element to success in Hollywood. One must pass muster with the specifically Jewish dictates of political correctness. Otherwise, one may find oneself very much unemployed and ignored. It took an actor/producer with the stature of Mel Gibson to buck the kosher Hollywood code to produce and distribute his controversial, but wildly successful film "The Passion." He endured a tidal wave of organized, Jewish protest, including death threats to his family.

Not surprisingly, Bob and Harvey Weinstein of Miramax Films declined to distribute The Passion assuming it would offend their crowd and/or fan the "eternal" flames of "anti-Semitism". On the other hand, the Weinstein brothers did distribute "Sin City" as well as Michael Moore's much ballyhooped Fahrenheit 9/11. Why? Both films respected the unwritten kosher code: vilification and defamation of Arab and/or Christians is perfectly fine, but one must never - even in the context of analyzing terrorism or U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East - demean Israel, Zionism or neo-conservatism. In fact, in Fahrenheit 9/11, Moore totally ignored the roles of Israel, Zionism and neo-conservatives, while tossing in a gratuitous, hefty dose of Arab-bashing. Good boy, Michael. Here's a million dollars!

For the ambitious film maker, it's crucial to remember three things -

1: Jews remain at the top of the Hollywood food chain.
2: They intend to remain there.
3: Don't' forget those first two things.

Like it or not, the gatekeepers of American mass media are disproportionately of Jewish stock. Though they famously disdain "white racism", prevailing Hollywodd customs affirm aggressive white Jewish networking. The results are nothing less than astonishing.

Much of America has come to "think Jewish" as attitudes have magically shifted on matters such as race, 'minority rights', school prayer, abortion rights, celebrating the 'holidays', and 'promoting our values' via an aggressive mission to impose democracy in all Mid-East countries except for the ethnocentric, and many say openly-racist, Jewish state of Israel.

OK, Israel may qualify as a "democracy" in the same way the white, apartheid South Africa did but there's one huge difference: concerted interevention from around the world finally brought the segregated Apartheid country of South Africa to its knees. White racial discrimination was declared to be "evil." Interestingly, Jewish activists played a decisive role in that campaign. However, Jewish Israelis and international Zionists - both Jewish and now so-called Christian Zionists - suffer no similar intense pressure, except by a growing grassroots movement of human rights and peace activists, who, thus far, lack any real significant political clout. Without apology, Israel and its supporters get to play by their own rules.

It's no accident that America's expanding global militancy implicitly hold the "security" of the Jewish state as its centerpiece. And with the help of vital US aid, Israel militarily maintains its commitment to a segregated society, with hellish consequences for the indigenous non-Jewish Palestinians.

How are the highly-placed "friends of Israel" able to bamboozle so much of the world? Through a complicated but interconnected array of media and grass-roots propaganda, political pressure, complex legalisms, victimhood identity via the Holocaust, and raw political muscle. In today's America, just an allegation of "anti-Semitism" can damage the career of public figures. And to fortify this taboo, Americans are regularly fed a hefty ration of Holocaust lore.

As a sidebar, here's an additional fact that would be funny if only it wasn't true: Holocaust "experts" are almost all Jewish. Does their collective obsession produce scholarship, or an appetite and license to propagandize? In any case, for the latest Holocaust news, about all one needs do is simply turn on the TV or pick up any 'major' newspaper. Yet, an accurate telling of the Jewish experience in America should spotlight not suffering or persecution, but success, acceptance, privilege and influence. Jews are, in fact, America's pre-eminent success story.

Although reportedly substantially less than 3% of our population, Jewish per capita income is unsurpassed, as is their presence at our nation's top universities and think tanks. As noted, American Jews make up a majority of Hollywood's ruling class and beyond that, Jewish over-representation is an accomplished fact in the fields of law, medicine and the entire entertainment and general media, including print and TV. This is no small matter. With the average American watching over four hours of TV or film every day, listening to radio, and perusing mainstream newspapers and magazines, these figures are evidence of a profound ethnic imbalance in the management and dissemination of news and information. For America's Jews, this translates into formidable political power.

The enduring fact remains that whoever owns and controls the media, can also leverage public opinion, and from there, government policies.

Indeed, Jewish media mavens have the means to easily advance their particular viewpoint of history, with far reaching consequences. And with the Jewish state of Israel embroiled in a condition of near-perpetual war since its founding in 1948, the question must be posed: might many of our country's most accomplished editors and story-tellers, who qualify as Israeli-Americans, have at least a minor conflict of interest?

Put another way: how can they NOT?

After all, Israeli 'security' remains the essential focus of organized Jewry. Countless pro-Israel organizations famously apply incessant pressure on government officials, political parties, candidates, journalists and fellow 'tribe-members' to lobby on Israel's behalf, since countless billions of dollars in U.S. aid are harnessed to advance the Jewish state's regional hegemony.

Consequently, maintaining a public willingness to favor America's present interventionist, pro-Israel/anti-Arab foreign policy is an essential component in any scenario culminating in The Final Zionist Solution. It's essential therefore that American gentiles "think correctly" on key Jewish issues. Thus, when Jewish interests are at stake, good and evil are neatly drawn (preferably in clear, unambiguous fashion) so that American consumers of news and entertainment can easily and passively draw the proper conclusions. Thus Arabs (particularly Palestinians) are "terrorists", Nazi demonology is a growth industry, and Holocaust Revisionism (widely misrepresented as "Holocaust Denial") is being peddled as a threat to global security. In fact, in numerous "free, Western democracies", such as Germany, the Netherlands, Austria and Switzerland, for example, to question the version of The Holocaust promoted by Zionists, including the six million figure and the gas chambers, is an actual crime punishable by fines and imprisonment.

Ernst Zundel was deported from the U.S. ostensibly for "visa violations" to Canada where he spent two years of his life in solitary confinement. Following that outrage, he was then recently was deported to solitary confinement in a German jail. His crime? Publicly questioning aspects of the Holocaust. Who's next?

Organized Jewry, progenitors of "speech codes" on countless American campuses, are raising the bar from censoring up to outright criminalizing free speech.

A balanced and accurate view of history DOES matter. Yet, when the facts don't fit, the media gatekeepers can purposefully misinterpret, obfuscate or simply overlook them. This may explain why, for instance, there is so little media interest in the annihilation of 20 million anti-Bolshevik Russians preceding WWII. After all, 20 million Russians KILLED BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT is the all-time tsunami of war crimes. But who were the perpetrators? Where are they now? The average American simply knows nothing about the dominant Jewish role in Communism's pernicious rise. Of course, this oversight is no accident.

Considering that over 275 million humans have perished in wars during the past century, America's nurtured obsession with, and elevation of, Jewish suffering in Europe during WWII might be seen as a peculiar idiosyncrasy. Indeed, many surmise that the American Mind is indeed under Zionist management. The irony of our nation's preoccupation with Jewish war causalities during WWII 55 years after the fact becomes even more repellent when we consider the horrendous, ONGOING persecution of gentiles in Palestine-Israel under Jewish occupation.

As for American cinema, there has been a sea of changes in the past generation. There's now a multicultural array of celebrities, including many Jewish ones. On the downside, Christianity doesn't get the kind of coverage it enjoyed when Frank Capra was directing. Thus, we are treated to seeing an array of stock Christian con artists, whores and criminals. As for Arabs, they're still welcome to play terrorist schemers, religious fanatics, or just plain unsavory characters. This is the mean-spirited side to American film that goes unacknowledged and unchallenged.

Recently, after reading several glowing reviews, we succumbed to seeing the aforementioned over-praised, over-hyped, action-revenge movie, Sin City. Directed by Frank Miller and Robert Rodriguez, with special 'guest director' Quentin Tarantino, Sin City is a gritty, sexy, violent and surrealistic foray into a stylized, comic-book version of post-modern urban mayhem. By contemporary standards of blood-letting, this film delivers far more than its share, but there is probably worse in circulation. Sin City's denigration of Christian icons, however, approaches new excesses, something that was also very evident in Tarantino's previous Kill Bill movies.

Not only do many of the villains in this hyper-violent yarn wear gaudy necklaces and earrings hung with Christian crosses, even multiple layers of them, "Sin City" manages to associate blue eyes with depravity...although for Hollywood, that's nothing new.

The two heroic characters (and they were not wearing any Christian crosses, or swastikas, of course) where portrayed by Mickey Rourke and Bruce Willis. It's Willis' character who finally manages to kill the the evil Catholic priest.

At any rate, we can rest assured that Hollywood shall likely refrain from depicting Jews in such a negative fashion. As for the rest of us, we are not supposed to complain. In fact, we're not even supposed to NOTICE, since it might indicated a racial loyalty which for anyone else except for Jews, is a modern sin.

This very real double standard speaks volumes about who holds real power in contemporary American
film and entertainment.

In a true democracy, EVERYONE has a voice. We advise that you use it. Or you may lose it.

Frank Miller (creator of the "Sin City" comic series and director of the film in question) can hardly be considered to be part of the "Secret Zionist Cabal To Control Hollywood, Inc." Most of his work to date will be found on the shelves of your better comic book (graphical novels, please) stores and not in mainstream theatres. Frank Miller's previous films include "RoboCop 3" and "RobCop 2".

Robert Rodriquez (obviously a Jew) is co-director of this film and has directed other such anti-Christian hits as "Spy Kids" and "From Dusk Till Dawn"

Interestingly enough, a key character in "From Dusk Till Dawn" is a minister with a crisis of faith who saves the other characters from vampires His faith re-affirmed, he becomes the religioius force that ultimately destroys the vampires -- it's a real intellectual thinkfest.

Since, neither the writer, nor the directors of the film in question are Jewish, I have to conclude that you maintain that the Zionist Elders who run the studio have dictated the films to have "anti-Christian symbology?

However, the production studio of "Sin City" is "Troublemaker Studios" -- most well known for films featuring Hispanic writers and stars.

I don't think anyone will argue that Jews are represented in Hollywood. But, representation doesn't imply control. If it did, Adam Goldberg and William Shatner would be getting 20 million per movie and Arnold Schwarzenegger would be on ESPN.

Nice try Slick.

Who made and distributes the film? Miramax

Who runs Miramax? Harvey Weinstein. Sounds like a nice Catholic boy eh?

http://www.nndb.com/people/636/000024564/

Would the movie have been made if it disparaged Jews? If Jews or Israelis were cast as the villains?

"Crafty 60 Minutes had studied the top slots in town. Their research showed that "only" about 60 percent of the most important positions in Hollywood were run by Jews. What did I think?

I managed to disqualify myself by saying that while Hollywood was not really "run" by anyone (it's far too chaotic for that), if Jews were about 2.5 percent of the population and were about 60 percent of Hollywood, they might well be said to be extremely predominant in that sector. "

http://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/hollyjew.htm

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ned=&q=jews+%2B+hollywood&btnmeta%3Dsearch%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web

Wendy Campbell should probably stick to "researching" the insidious "Kosher Tax".
Hopefully, few will be taken in by the thoroughly discredited themes present in Wendy and Mark's article.
Any article dealing with media mind control which fails to discuss things such as -
The role of the Public Relations/Advertising industry.
The influence of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) on the media.
The MKULTRA project/Project Montauk.
The London based Tavistock Institute of Human Relations - possibly the most important PSYOPS research institute in the world.
The role the mass media plays in society(s)
- and prefers emphasising the religio-ethnicity of some of the players, should be taken as suspect.

It seems that it's time for another round of "Jewish Hate and the Global Conspiracy", an article which looks at the so-called "New World Order" (a topic I scratch the surface of at http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2004/09/78862_comment.php#78916 ) as well as looking at some of the less well known history of Holywood.

====================================================================================

Jewish Hate and the Global Conspiracy

The following letter to the editor was sent by Dr. Horowitz to Mr. Clay Douglas, Editor and Publisher of "The Free American" regarding his April 2001 feature entitled, "Jews: Do They Really Run the World? Is it Hate to Ask that Question?"

Clay Douglas,
Editor/Publisher
The Free American
US Hwy. 380, Box 2943
Bingham, New Mexico 87832

Dear Editor:

I am writing to express my deepest, heart-felt, sadness regarding your April 2001 feature entitled, "Jews: Do They Really Run the World? Is it Hate to Ask that Question?" As someone who has contributed to, and financially supported, your work and magazine for years, I am now suddenly confronted by the use of "The Free American" to promote hatred against the Jewish people, not just the "Jews" alleged to be controlling the world. For this I express my sincere apologies to the intelligent remnant that perceive, as I do, the abuse of the First Amendment (freedom of speech) in this issue.

Above all, I am extremely disappointed in you for publishing such a contextually biased and hate filled article, allegedly by an honest, investigative, anonymous author, who on every page provides egregious distortions condemning the Jewish race in general as people "by their nature, due to their religion and upbringing, are virulently, relentlessly 'specially anti-Christ.'" You abuse our friendship, my support, and my name to justify your cause. You used me as an example of one of few "good" Jews in your opening paragraph by writing "there were many Jews who believed in Christ, called Messianic Jews, . . . who were not involved with any anti-Christ movement." These quotes aptly exemplify the ignorance, and subliminal racism, of your publication. The term "nature" implies a genetic predisposition or evolution, but "religion and upbringing" refers more accurately to behavioral and cultural determinants of admittedly biased and likewise hate-filled Jewish ideologies. The second quote implies the vast majority of Jewish people are taught to hate and fear versus love and respect Christians and/or Christianity. As a Jewish man and author of "Why It's Time Jews and Christians Unite," I submit this was not my experience during family or religious instruction. Nor do I believe that Jews, in general, are reared to distrust gentiles any more than other Jews, or any more than gentiles are taught, through works like yours, to distrust Jews.

I was obviously wrong to assume you understood the destructive manner in which populations (we refer to as "sheeple") have been, and with your article are being, divided to conquer the global flock. For this, I also apologize to my supporters since I suspect your feature has done more to misinform the American patriot community than any "anti-Semitic" publication I have read to date, including The Protocols of the Elders of Sion (the Masonic document that was re-named "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" following its reworking to propagandize, like your article, Jewish hate). Deceptively, you stated, "The author went to great lengths to point out that all Jews were not necessarily involved" in global fascism and genocides. Where in the article were these "great lengths?" Why would you even add the word "necessarily" in the above quote? This implies your own belief that possibly all Jews participate in this sinister plot, or your desire to raise such suspicions in gullible readers. Cunningly, stating your own position/bias, you challenged "anyone who could, to dispute the facts" presented by the anonymous author. Why would anyone bother when you, the editor/publisher-who most readers assume did his due diligence in substantiating the author's claims (suspiciously missing references)-stated, "It was factual, a little frightening, and dead on when put into context with current events." Regarding current events, your publication fits precisely the "divide and conquer" New World Order protocols.

Time does not permit me to respond to almost every page and paragraph of the article that included gross misrepresentations. I will focus merely on two glaring deceptions: the alleged Jewish- ness of international bankers, particularly the Rothschilds, and the alleged "Jewish control" over Hollywood and the liberal media in general. The following is excerpted largely from my forthcoming book, Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare (Tetrahedron, LLC; 1-888-508-4787). I have added "not Jewish (NJ)" to the globalists and international financers who shame other religions.

Rothschild, J.P. Morgan, and the Rockefeller Banking Axis

The most infamous anti-Jewish document in history-The Protocols of the Elders of Sion was reworked (into the "Elders of Zion") during a meeting led in 1773 by Mayer Rothschild, a non- Hebrew Khazar. The Khazar's ancestry, according to most scholars, stems from Noah's son Yefet (Japheth), predating Abraham's covenant with God, the tribe of Judah, and therefore, the first genetically Jewish people.

Baigent et al in Holy Blood Holy Grail, provided a harsh reality check regarding the Masonic, not "Jewish," origin of these infamous Protocols. Originally a secret document that heralded a deadly totalitarian plot for herding the masses into a "New World Order" run by financial elitists, the document had been turned into an anti-Semitic propaganda piece during the Russian revolution. "By 1919, the Protocols were also being circulated by Alfred Rosenberg," who later became the chief racial theoretician and propagandist for the National Socialist Party in Germany. The document was said to have advanced convincing "proof" of an "international Jewish conspiracy." Hitler referred to it in Mein Kampf with vicious conviction as to the document's authenticity. Today, experts correctly view the Protocols as an insidious forgery distracting from the original globalists' document.

Professor Carroll Quigley (NJ)-President Clinton's teacher and mentor at Georgetown University during the mid-1960s-explained that the financial elite maintained global colonialism among their highest aspirations. In order to accomplish this, secret societies were administered largely on behalf of the Rothschild (NJ) and Rhodes (NJ) dynasties. The secret societies in which they invested had inner member structures that were shielded by successively larger outer circles. The central part of the structure was established by March, 1891, using Rhodes's money. Rothschild trustee Lord Alfred Milner directed the organization that was called "The Round Table." This organization "worked behind the scenes at the highest levels of British government, influencing foreign policy and England's involvement and conduct of WWI" and later WWII.

According to secret society investigator and author Jan van Helsing, the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) evolved largely from efforts of members of the Committee of 300 and The Round Table. Other sources have reported that MI6 has exercised far greater worldwide control than most people realize. More wiretaps in the United States, for instance, have been administered on behalf of MI6 than the CIA. In this regard, Loftus and Aarons reported in The Secret War Against The Jews (St. Martins Press, 1996), that, "for the last fifty years, virtually every Jewish citizen, organization, and charity in the world has been the victim of electronic surveillance by Great Britain, with the knowing and willing assistance of the intelligence services of the United States."

To set the stage for the first World War, The Round Table directors developed the "Royal Institute for International Affairs," or RIIA. It was also known as "Chatham House" and had among its members Lords Albert Grey (NJ) and Arnold Toynbee (NJ). The latter was known as the éminence grise of MI6.

Apparently the Masonic influence in the affairs of the world's leading intelligence organization has been striking and esoteric. Even the name "MI6" reflected knowledge of the ancient mystical arcana, as discussed in my earlier book Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse (Tetrahedron, LLC, 1999).

It was Lord Toynbee of the MI6 who, following "brainstorming" sessions conducted at the Wellington House into ways to condition the public into accepting World War I, delivered the orders from the Committee of 300. Dr. John Coleman, a retired MI6 agent, documented this in his excellent book, Conspirators' Heirarchy. Other famous members of the Committee of 300, past and present, included many non-Jewish leaders including George Bush, George Schultz, J.P. Morgan, John M. Forbes, David Rockefeller, and Cardinal Spellman.

Another leading committee member, Lord Rothmere, used his newspapers to test the Wellington House "social conditioning" strategies. Following a six-month test period, it was learned that eighty-seven percent of the public had formed their opinions without using critical or rational judgment-the intended result- much like the risk posed by The Free American Jewish-hate article. Thereafter, the English working class, according to van Helsing, "was subjected to sophisticated propaganda methods to convince them that they had to send their sons by the thousands to their deaths" in WWI.

In response, Teddy Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States, complained during his 1912 election campaign, "Behind the visible government there is an invisible government upon the throne that owes the people no loyalty and recognizes no responsibility. To destroy this invisible government, to undo the ungodly union between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the task of a statesman."

From Shadow Governors to Rockefeller High Finance

The solidification of secret society power in America began in 1776 around the time Adam Weishaupt was establishing the Order of the Bavarian Illuminati on behalf of the Rothschilds. The anonymous Free American author correctly detailed how Weishaupt, genetically Jewish "converted to Catholicism and became a Catholic priest. . . ." before he formed for the Rothschilds the Illuminati organization. Thus, how "Jewish" was he?

Your article, and Freemasons, obviously wish to pin the blame for global genocides and agendas on "Jews" rather than Freemasons currently seeking the deception of patriotic America, yet the founding of the United States was the result of the secret plan carried out by Freemasons beginning in the 17th century. Freemasons had organized the American War of Independence. The U.S. Constitution was penned and signed by Freemasons. Almost a third of American presidents have been Freemasons. The Great Seal of the United States with the pyramid and all seeing eye, the bald eagle that replaced the phoenix, the original thirteen states, stars and stripes, were all adopted symbols of Freemasonry. Though they had been put in place by Weishaupt to convey Rothschild wishes, the symbolism dated back to the Masons of ancient Egypt. The Illuminated pyramid on the American dollar bill was the design of Philip Rothschild (NJ) as Ayn Rand, his lover, divulged in Atlas Shrugged.

Although early American political leaders Benjamin Franklin (NJ) and Thomas Jefferson (NJ) heavily favored private centralized banking, in 1790 Alexander Hamilton (NJ) was appointed secretary of the treasury, and reformed policy heavily favoring his silent benefactors Mayer Amschel Rothschild and his sons. A year later, Hamilton established the "First National Bank of the United States" fashioned after the "Bank of England." The Rothschilds controlled it.

After Mayer Rothschild's death in 1812, Nathan took control over the family fortune and opened the "Nathan Mayer Rothschild & Sons Bank" in London, Vienna, Paris, and Berlin. In America it was represented by J. P. Morgan (NJ) & Co., August Belmont (NJ) & Co., and Kuhn Loeb & Company.

During the American Civil War, the Rothschilds financed both sides of the conflict. "The reasons leading to this civil war," van Helsing wrote, "were almost completely due to the actions and provocations of Rothschild agents." One of the troublemakers, founder of the "Knights of the Golden Circle," was George Bickley (NJ). Bickley extolled the advantages of succession from the Union by the Confederate States. On the other side, the Rothschild-J. P. Morgan and August Belmont banks financed the Union. In addition, Rothschild' s London bank supported the North, while its Paris bank funded the South. It was a glorious business.

President Lincoln finally caught wind of the scam and withheld immense interest payments to the Rothschilds. He then petitioned Congress to print "greenbacks"-dollars over which only the Union held printing power. In response, the furious Rothschilds are said to have arranged his assassination. John Wilkes Booth murdered Lincoln on April 14, 1865. Booth was freed from jail due to the efforts of the Knights of the Golden Circle. He spent the duration of his days living comfortably in England, funded by the Rothschilds.

By the early 1900s, the Masonic-linked "secret societies," including the CFR, held a stranglehold on America's leading social, economic, and political institutions. In 1913, American banking mogul William Averell Harriman (NJ) was initiated into the Skull & Bones fraternity. During the "Roaring Twenties" Harriman became the chief Western financier of communism, the Russian governments, and their Ruskombank-where Max May, a Skull & Bones brother of Harriman, was vice-president. May was simultaneously vice-president of the Guaranty Trust Company, controlled by J. P. Morgan and by extension the Nathan Mayer Rothschild Bank. Other Skull & Bones members partnered with J. P. Morgan at that time included Harold Stanley and Thomas Cochran (NJ). The capital used to create the Guaranty Trust came from the Harrimans, Rockefellers, Vanderbilts (NJ), and Whitneys (NJ)-all families with blood kin in the Skull & Bones. Percy Rockefeller (NJ) represented his family's interest in the Skull & Bones as well as Guaranty Trust, which he directed from 1915 to 1930. Rothschild and Bavarian Illuminati representatives helped establish the Rockefeller's European Standard Oil empire as well as Carnegie's steelworks and Harriman's railroad.

Many ignorant "patriots" have claimed the Rockefeller family is Jewish. This stems largely from an article spread in "Christian" circles by Richard Darcy, Jr. entitled "Rockefeller's Jewish Ancestory!" (The misspelling of Ancestry was Darcy's.) He reference Stephen Birmingham's book The Grandees in which the author stated the Rockefellers, and other elite American families, were surprised to learn of their Sephardic ancestry. The fact is that as early as 1904 Silas Hubbard self publish from New York a book exposing John D. Rockefeller's various frauds citing his Sunday church-going/ Bible-carrying behavior and alternatively Monday through Friday criminality.

The introduction of the "Federal Reserve System" in 1913 enabled the Rothschild-Rockefeller banking axis to consolidate their American financial powers. Banking chiefs, who were largely supported by the Rothschilds, became the chairmen of the first Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Following passage of "The Federal Reserve Act," Warburg led the U.S. Congress to fraudulently forward the 16th Amendment to the Constitution that granted Congress the power to levy personal income taxes on American citizens. The legislation was required since the United States government could no longer print money to finance its operations due to the controlling forces of the international banking cartel.

The Warburg family, admittedly Jewish, is said to have heavily financed Hitler's rise to power and I.G. Farben's operations along with the Rockefellers and others. In Sidney Warburg's Hitler's Secret Backers (CPA Book Publisher, 1933, reprinted 1983), prominent Nazi officer Franz von Papen credits the book for accurately detailing Hitler's financial backers wherein "all the bankers named are gentiles, not Jewish."

With No Apologies: The Personal and Political Memoirs of U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater, the obviously Jewish Senator expressed the insider's view that The Round Table's cover organization, the CFR, tightly controlled the American political scene with Rockefellers at the helm. "I believe the Council on Foreign Relations and its ancillary elitist groups [referring to the other "secret societies" such as the Skull & Bones] are indifferent to communism. They have no ideological anchors. In their pursuit of a New World Order they are prepared to deal without prejudice with a communist state, a socialist state, a democratic state, monarchy, oligarchy-it's all the same to them.

". . . Their rationale rests exclusively on materialism," Senator Goldwater added. "When a new president comes on board, there is a great turnover in personnel but no change in policy. For instance, as stated earlier, during the Nixon years Henry Kissinger, CFR member and Nelson Rockefeller's protégé, was in charge of foreign policy. When Jimmy Carter was elected, Kissinger was replaced with Zbigniew Brzezinski (NJ), CFR member and David Rockefeller's protégé.

Henry Kissinger, hailed as a hero by unwitting Jewish organizations, and recently exposed as a war criminal in Harper's magazine (Feb. and March, 2001), was excommunicated from the Jewish religion on June 20, 1976 during a religious ceremony presided over by five member Rabbis of the Supreme Rabbinic Court of America, partly for helping top Nazi war criminals to escape from Germany at the close of the war.

Thus, the Bible correctly counsels, "Beware of those that call themselves Jews who are not." In regard to the above, and the repugnant Free American article, readers are urged to "Beware of those that call non-Jews "Jews" in an effort to create inter-racial and inter-religious hatred." In the anonymous author's case, it might also be wise to "Beware of those that call themselves Christians who are not."

Concerning the repeated allegation that Hollywood, and the general media, is "controlled by Jews," Dr. Coleman more accurately detailed the Committee of 300's control over the American media by way of the CFR. He likewise recognized Zionism, and virtually all major religions, heavily infiltrated, if not completely controlled, by primarily British globalists.

America's mainstream magazine chief, for instance, Henry Luce (founder of Time, Life and many other periodicals), helped, along with the Rockfeller family to engineer the "National Purpose" for all Americans during the early 1950s. This included linking "guns, butter, and the new technology" for "weapons production to the cause of Freedom and the Free World." Henry Luce, according his biographer, W.A. Swanberg, was "the son of missionaries and one of America's leading Presbyterian laymen."

Moreover, intelligent persons would glean from the Halpern/ Jacobovici documentary "Jews, Movies, Hollywoodism and the American Dream" more of the truth. Each of the movie studio founders were Jewish immigrants who toughly fought their way to the top of an industry controlled by the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) elite who maintained support from bankers- the old money. The Jewish film financiers were unable to compete in New York where the Edison Corporation had monopolized the movie industry early by producing films that degraded Jews and Blacks as the stagnant underclasses. The Jewish moviemakers, thus, moved to Hollywood, California to circumvent this political snag. Here they found fertile soil, what America was supposed to provide, for their creative and imaginative productions. Increasingly successful with the development of films that consistently relayed the struggles of "little guys" against various establishments and odds-their own story reflected in many, if not most, of the Westerns and musicals they produced-they largely (some historians claim totally) created the fantasy culture in which we as Americans currently live.

Shortly before World War II, some of the Hollywood Jews began to speak out against fascism on American shores. They likely realized that old money, including the Rothschilds' and Rockefellers', had largely engineered Hitler' s rise to power, and that America too was threatened in the same way pre-Nazi Germany had fallen. Harry Warner, Warner Brothers Studio chief, for instance, gave an anti-fascist speech before the American Legion in which he clearly referred to the secret racist societies and apparently the Liberty Lobby's neo-Nazi "propaganda machine" in America. He urged:

"Drive them out. Make America unsafe for those who seek to tear down what others have built through the generations from 1776. Drive them from their secret meeting places. Destroy their insidious propaganda machines. Drive out their "[Skull &] Bones," and their leagues, the [Ku Klux] clans and the black legions, the silver shirts, the black shirts, and their dirty shirts. Help keep America for those who believe in America."

As a result of this perceived threat, Former Ambassador to Britain, Joseph P. Kennedy, met secretly in Los Angeles with officials representing the international bankers and shadow governors. He reportedly argued that Jews would be blamed if America entered the war, although there were other secret matters discussed. It is likely that Harry Warner's American Legion speech alarmed America's elite that they may be vulnerable to Hollywood exposés.

Hypersensitive to Jewish persecution, and their own continued immigrant status and insecurities, the movie moguls refused to produce any films heralding the Nazi threat prior to the Pearl Harbor attack and America's declared war with Germany. The two anti-Nazi films that were produced in Hollywood before that time came from non-Jews.

With the war, and the American government's urging, Hollywood went into full-scale production of propaganda films. Roosevelt had personally requested the moguls' produce Russian films depicting the communists as our friends. This was later used against the Hollywood filmmakers during the McCarthy era.

By World War II, the "Hollywood Jews" had worked to become totally secular with similar themes in their films reflecting mass integration, including intermarriages. Though the American military was racially segregated completely at that time, Hollywood movies depicted our armed forces as fully integrated.

The Jews in Hollywood had done such a superb job on behalf of the American war effort that following armistice the studio bosses received military awards. They were also escorted to Europe to tour the concentration camps courtesy of the U.S. Government. Historians remain perplexed as to why no films were produced depicting this genocidal horror. The consensus of critics hold that the "Hollywood Jews" were simply too afraid to project any pro- Jewish sentiments that might lift their thin veil as seculars and integrated Americans.

Following the war, Louis B. Meyer, MGM Studios chief, called for the creation of a "new human type," liberated from the fears and persecutions of racism in America. "We gather here today," He said, "not as Catholics, Protestants, or Jews. All of the ancient bloods have contributed to those who meet here today. This great country is itself the result of the unity of all of these ancient bloods. We are all here as Americans."

Soon after these words were spoken, the Hollywood Jews were called before the U.S. Congress's Hearings on Communism directed by the vicious and openly anti-Jewish John Rankin, who like The Free American article, blamed Jews for virtually every social woe. During the hearings, a number of persecuted movie executives stated the obvious-the shadow governors' efforts to regain control over the silver screen and American culture by wrestling it away from the Hollywood Jewish cartel. The media moguls folded precipitously beneath this political pressure. Then they helped facilitate what we recognize today was a virtual witch-hunt, a total ruse, given the international bankers' creation of communism and subsequent funding of its leaders.

In summary, there is nothing new under the sun, or in The Free American Jewish hate diatribe by Clay Douglas and an anonymous co-author. I, for one, would like to know the source of the article. Suspiciously, it appears perfectly timed and suited for a contemporary political agenda that insidiously includes resurrecting Jewish hate. Let the primary author reveal himself and his political/financial affiliations. Does he maintain connections to the Liberty Lobby, publishers of The Spotlight? Is he affiliated with other groups that selectively relay half-truths to fully deceive well-meaning largely susceptible populations such as American patriots and Christians? Free American readers deserve to know the whole truth. Will Clay Douglas provide it, along with an apology? Time will tell.

"20 million Russians KILLED BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT is the all-time war crime. But who were the perpetrators? The average person simply knows nothing about the dominant Jewish role in Communism's pernicious rise. This oversight is no accident."

Thoroughly discredited disinfo - see above article and the following appendix from Antony C. Sutton's (available online) book "WALL STREET AND THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION" - http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/

====================================================================================

Appendix II

THE JEWISH-CONSPIRACY THEORY OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION

There is an extensive literature in English, French, and German reflecting the argument that the Bolshevik Revolution was the result of a "Jewish conspiracy"; more specifically, a conspiracy by Jewish world bankers. Generally, world control is seen as the ultimate objective; the Bolshevik Revolution was but one phase of a wider program that supposedly reflects an age-old religious struggle between Christianity and the "forces of darkness."

The argument and its variants can be found in the most surprising places and from quite surprising persons. In February 1920 Winston Churchill wrote an

article — rarely cited today — for the London Illustrated Sunday Herald entitled "Zionism Versus Bolshevism." In this' article Churchill concluded that it was "particularly important... that the National Jews in every country who are loyal to the land of their adoption should come forward on every occasion . . . and take a prominent part in every measure for combatting the Bolshevik conspiracy." Churchill draws a line between "national Jews" and what he calls "international Jews." He argues that the "international and for the most atheistical Jews" certainly had a "very great" role in the creation of Bolshevism and bringing about the Russian Revolution. He asserts (contrary to fact) that with the exception of Lenin, "the majority" of the leading figures in the revolution were Jewish, and adds (also contrary to fact) that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship were excepted by the Bolsheviks from their policies of seizure. Churchill calls the international Jews a "sinister confederacy" emergent from the persecuted populations of countries where Jews have been persecuted on account of their race. Winston Churchill traces this movement back to Spartacus-Weishaupt, throws his literary net around Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxemburg, and Emma Goldman, and charges: "This world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing."

Churchill then argues that this conspiratorial Spartacus-Weishaupt group has been the mainspring of every subversive movement in the nineteenth century. While pointing out that Zionism and Bolshevism are competing for the soul of the Jewish people, Churchill (in 1920) was preoccupied with the role of the Jew in the Bolshevik Revolution and the existence of a worldwide Jewish conspiracy.

Another well-known author in the 1920s, Henry Wickham Steed describes in the second volume of his Through 30 Years 1892-1922 (p. 302) how he attempted to bring the Jewish-conspiracy concept to the attention of Colonel Edward M. House and President Woodrow Wilson. One day in March 1919 Wickham Steed called Colonel House and found him disturbed over Steed's recent criticism of U.S. recognition of the Bolsheviks. Steed pointed out to House that Wilson would be discredited among the many peoples and nations of Europe and "insisted that, unknown to him, the prime movers were Jacob Schiff, Warburg and other international financiers, who wished above all to bolster up the Jewish Bolshevists in order to secure a field for German and Jewish exploitation of Russia."1 According to Steed, Colonel House argued for the establishment of economic relations with the Soviet Union.

Probably the most superficially damning collection of documents on the Jewish conspiracy is in the State Department Decimal File (861.00/5339). The central document is one entitled "Bolshevism and Judaism," dated November 13, 1918. The text is in the form of a report, which states that the revolution in Russia was engineered "in February 1916" and "it was found that the following persons and firms were engaged in this destructive work":

(1) Jacob Schiff
Jew

(2) Kuhn, Loeb & Company
Jewish Firm

Management:
Jacob Schiff
Jew

Felix Warburg
Jew

Otto H. Kahn
Jew

Mortimer L. Schiff
Jew

Jerome J. Hanauer
Jew

(3) Guggenheim
Jew

(4) Max Breitung
Jew

(5) Isaac Seligman
Jew

The report goes on to assert that there can be no doubt that the Russian Revolution was started and engineered by this group and that in April 1917

Jacob Schiff in fact made a public announcement and it was due to his financial influence that the Russian revolution was successfully accomplished and in the Spring 1917 Jacob Schitf started to finance Trotsky, a Jew, for the purpose of accomplishing a social revolution in Russia.

The report contains other miscellaneous information about Max Warburg's financing of Trotsky, the role of the Rheinish-Westphalian syndicate and Olof Aschberg of the Nya Banken (Stockholm) together with Jivotovsky. The anonymous author (actually employed by the U.S. War Trade Board)2 states that the links between these organizations and their financing of the Bolshevik Revolution show how "the link between Jewish multi-millionaires and Jewish proletarians was forged." The report goes on to list a large number of Bolsheviks who were also Jews and then describes the actions of Paul Warburg, Judus Magnes, Kuhn, Loeb & Company, and Speyer & Company.

The report ends with a barb at "International Jewry" and places the argument into the context of a Christian-Jewish conflict backed up by quotations from the Protocols of Zion. Accompanying this report is a series of cables between the State Department in Washington and the American embassy in London concerning the steps to be taken with these documents:3

5399 Great Britain, TEL. 3253 i pm

October 16, 1919 In Confidential File
Secret for Winslow from Wright. Financial aid to Bolshevism & Bolshevik Revolution in Russia from prominent Am. Jews: Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mendell Schiff, Jerome Hanauer, Max Breitung & one of the Guggenheims. Document re- in possession of Brit. police authorities from French sources. Asks for any facts re-.

* * * * *

Oct. 17 Great Britain TEL. 6084, noon r c-h 5399 Very secret. Wright from Winslow. Financial aid to Bolshevik revolution in Russia from prominent Am. Jews. No proof re- but investigating. Asks to urge Brit. authorities to suspend publication at least until receipt of document by Dept.

* * * * *

Nov. 28 Great Britain TEL. 6223 R 5 pro. 5399
FOR WRIGHT. Document re financial aid to Bolsheviki by prominent American jews. Reports — identified as French translation of a statement originally prepared in English by Russian citizen in Am. etc. Seem most unwise to give — the distinction of publicity.

It was agreed to suppress this material and the files conclude, "I think we have the whole thing in cold storage."

Another document marked "Most Secret" is included with this batch of material. The provenance of the document is unknown; it is perhaps FBI or military intelligence. It reviews a translation of the Protocols of the Meetings of the Wise Men of Zion, and concludes:

In this connection a letter was sent to Mr. W. enclosing a memorandum from us with regard to certain information from the American Military Attache to the effect that the British authorities had letters intercepted from various groups of international Jews setting out a scheme for world dominion. Copies of this material will be very useful to us.

This information was apparently developed and a later British intelligence report makes the flat accusation:

SUMMARY: There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international movement controlled by Jews; communications are passing between the leaders in America, France, Russia and England with a view to concerted action....4

However, none of the above statements can be supported with hard empirical evidence. The most significant information is contained in the paragraph to the effect that the British authorities possessed "letters intercepted from various groups of international Jews setting out a scheme for world dominion." If indeed such letters exist, then they would provide support (or nonsupport) for a presently unsubstantiated hypothesis: to wit, that the Bolshevik Revolution and other revolutions are the work of a worldwide Jewish conspiracy.

Moveover, when statements and assertions are not supported by hard evidence and where attempts to unearth hard evidence lead in a circle back to the starting point — particularly when everyone is quoting everyone else — then we must reject the story as spurious. There is no concrete evidence that Jews were involved in the Bolshevik Revolution because they were Jewish. There may indeed have been a higher proportion of Jews involved, but given tsarist treatment of Jews, what else would we expect? There were probably many Englishmen or persons of English origin in the American Revolution fighting the redcoats. So what? Does that make the American Revolution an English conspiracy? Winston Churchill's statement that Jews had a "very great role" in the Bolshevik Revolution is supported only by distorted evidence. The list of Jews involved in the Bolshevik Revolution must be weighed against lists of non-Jews involved in the revolution. When this scientific procedure is adopted, the proportion of foreign Jewish Bolsheviks involved falls to less than twenty percent of the total number of revolutionaries — and these Jews were mostly deported, murdered, or sent to Siberia in the following years. Modern Russia has in fact maintained tsarist anti-Semitism.

It is significant that documents in the State Department files confirm that the investment banker Jacob Schiff, often cited as a source of funds for the Bolshevik Revolution, was in fact against support of the Bolshevik regime.5 This position, as we shall see, was in direct contrast to the Morgan-Rockefeller promotion of the Bolsheviks.

The persistence with which the Jewish-conspiracy myth has been pushed suggests that it may well be a deliberate device to divert attention from the real issues and the real causes. The evidence provided in this book suggests that the New York bankers who were also Jewish had relatively minor roles in supporting the Bolsheviks, while the New York bankers who were also Gentiles (Morgan, Rockefeller, Thompson) had major roles.

What better way to divert attention from the real operators than by the medieval bogeyman of anti-Semitism?

Footnotes:

1See Appendix 3 for Schiff's actual role.

2The anonymous author was a Russian employed by the U.S. War Trade Board. One of the three directors of the U.S. War Trade Board at this time was John Foster Dulles.

3U.S. State Dept. Decimal File, 861.00/5399.

4Great Britain, Directorate of Intelligence, A Monthly Review of the Progress of Revolutionary Movements Abroad, no. 9, July 16, 1913 (861.99/5067).

5See Appendix 3.

When was the last time we saw a Jewish/Israeli villain in a Hollywood flick?

And here's a bunch of Jews who did their best to stop Stalin...

http://www.zundelsite.org/english/jews-under-stalin/

Piper says that Zionism is being equated with Americanism. Zionist agents like Nathan Sharansky crafted the overblown and specious rhetoric of Bush's second inaugural speech that committed the US to advancing the Zionist agenda using force.

History provides a sobering warning as to where this could be leading. In his essay, "The Nature of Zionism," Russian author Vladimir Stepin writes,

"During the civil war in Russia, the Zionists also performed another task. Using some units of the Red Army - Trotsky was the chairman of the country's Revolutionary Military Council - they organized the Jewish pogrom in Seversk.

The result of this was the "Law on Those Involved in Pogroms" of 27 July 1918. In accordance with this law, a monstrous Zionist terror raged in Russia for ten years: a person accused of anti-Semitism was, without any argument being allowed, declared to be involved in pogroms and placed against the wall to be shot.

Not only anti-Zionists, but the best representatives of the intelligentsia of Russia, could be accused of being anti-Semitic, and so too could anyone one felt like accusing of it. People saw who was exercising power in Russia and expressed their discontent with it. 90% of the members of the Cheka - the Soviet security organ, 1918-1922 - were Zionists.

Apart from the law on those involved in pogroms, the Zionists practised genocide against the ethnic groups inhabiting Russia, and they did so by accusing people of counter-revolutionary activities, sabotage, and so on, irrespective of whether or not the people in question really had conducted such activities. It was standard practice merely to put them against the wall to be shot."

http://www.radioislam.org/zionism/

A familiar ring?

"When was the last time we saw a Jewish/Israeli villain in a Hollywood flick?"

When what the last time you saw a Hindu villian in a Hollywood movie?

The population of Hindus in the US is nearly the same as that of the Jews (6 Million US Hindus, versus 7 Million US Jews)

Are you suggesting a vast Hindu conspiracy to control Hollywood?

Speaking of Jewish villains --

You might consider --

Many of the characters in "Once Upon A Time in America"

Sam ' Ace' Rothenstein (played by Robert DeNiro) in "Casino"

Moe Green in "Godfather"

Hymen Roth in "Godfather"

Bugsy Segal in "Bugsy"

Meyer Lanski in "Bugsy"

The pharisees in "The Passion" and "Jesus Christ Superstar"

Is that enough?

"Are you suggesting a vast Hindu conspiracy to control Hollywood?"

No Slick, but if Hindus were only about 2.5 percent of the US population but were about 60 percent of Hollywood, as Jews are, I might. Maybe you missed that bit Slick. You seem to be missing a few bits. Keep pushing though and I might even post a link to some interesting research on cultish aspects of Jewish culture by Kevin McDonald.

I did notice that you struggled to get your Jewish villain quota.

Joe Greene from The Godfather (1971) was a minor bit part and his ethnicity, if mentioned at all (?), was only peripheral to the story.

Bugsy (1991) was another of those Hollywood glorifications of gangsters where, of all the gangsters available to glorify, they chose the most famous Jewish gangster. Funny that. Jews are tough guys too eh?

The Passion of the Christ (2004) generated a massive hissy fit from American Jewry who wanted it banned. None of the Jew run major Hollywood companies would touch it for some reason.

"Amid the maelstrom of controversy building in the Jewish community about The Passion of Christ, one voice has punctuated the cries of the critics with a fresh sound. He claims that those protesting that the movie is anti-Semitic have no moral ground to do so. His name is Daniel Lappen, and his reasoning is intriguing.

Lappen says the critics have forfeited their right to condemn The Passion of Christ, because they were silent when the Brooklyn Museum showed works of "art" demeaning Jesus and Catholicism-such as the picture of Mary covered in elephant dung. He says the Brooklyn Museum's director Arnold Lehman has no moral authority, because he showed the anti-Catholic film Hell's Angel which denounced Mother Theresa as a religious extremist and depicted her obscenely. Lappen then cites the names of Jewish critics who have used the First Amendment to defend vicious cinematic assaults on Christ and Christians, from Universal's The Last Temptation of Christ to Miramax's anti-Catholic movie Priest."

The one voice of dissent from within the Jewish lynch mob was...a rabbi.

http://home.christianity.com/ministries/workplace_culture/mastermedia/89972.html

Another nice touch about The Passion is that, for a change, the credits were full of lovely Italian names instead of the usual stream of Jewish ones that you get in your average Hollywood flick.

The other film you mention gave me good laugh. Jesus Christ Superstar (1973) was directed by, and screenplay written by, one Norman Jewison. It also shows how much the US has changed in thirty years. Was there a cry of anti-semitism about that film back then? So how is it that only thirty years later Jews, at only about 2% percent of the US population are cocky enough to call for the banning of the Christ story on the basis that it is anti-semitic?

Hollywood can always turn a buck from dead people. Bugsy Seigel was a syndicated murderer who knocked people on demand for the mob with Murder Inc and Norman Jewison turned a buck from some Jewish guy that other Jews killed over two thousand years ago.

Now Jews mainly get others to kill their neighbours and fight their battles in the Middle East by exploiting their positions in American society. One good example of that is the way Hollywood vilifies and ridicules Arabs (and all things Goy) in order to get Americans to prop up the Jews colonial outpost of Israel.

Don't mind me Slick, if you insist I will agree that there is no nose on your face.