calendar >>>
> german ameri
> ee82hl
> udx5ugbmaj
> udx5ugbmaj
> udx5ugbmaj
add an event >>>
features
   anti-war
   migration
   climate change
   ecology
   students
   work
   health
   gender
   culture
   indymedia
   global news
   anti-nuclear
   anti-racism
   civil liberties
   anti-corporate
   miscellaneous
   social movements

 

announcements list
contributors list

about us
   contact
   get involved
   support us
   editorial policy

resources
   activist groups
   syndication
   links

radio
podcast

engagemedia

search


themes
   white theme black theme




 

 

 


printable version - email this article

Electronic Surveillance bills to become law
by Monty Miller Thursday December 09, 2004 at 02:04 AM

Two bills which greatly expand powers of electronic surveillance of individuals, have passed both houses of Federal Parliamwnt on 8 December, with the support of the Labor Party.

Here is what the Electronic Frontiers Australia said:

Surveillance Devices Bills 2004

This Bill was passed, without amendment, by the Senate on 30 Nov 2004 and the House of Reps on 8 Dec 2004.

The Surveillance Devices Bill 2004 regulates the use of surveillance devices (data, optical, listening and tracking devices) by law enforcement agencies. However it also significantly widens the circumstances in which they can be used and the types that can be used.

For a full assessment by Electronic Frontiers Australia
http://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Privacy/sd_bill2004.html

Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment (Stored Communications) Bill 2004

This Bill was passed, without amendment, by the Senate on 29 Nov 2004 and the House of Reps on 8 Dec 2004. The ALP withdrew the amendments they had tabled before the election (which would have given effect to the Senate Committee recommendations) and voted with the Liberal/National Government to pass the Bill. The Greens and Democrats voted against the Bill.

The Bill was the Commonwealth Government's third attempt since early 2002 to amend the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 ("the TI Act") in relation to email, SMS and voice mail messages. The stored communications provisions of this Bill are substantially the same as the proposed and rejected provisions of the TI Bill 2002.

Moreover, this Bill is even more objectionable than the 2002 proposal because it completely removes email, SMS and voice mail messages (stored communications) from the scope of the protection of the TI Act.

For a full assessment by Electronic Frontiers Australia
http://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Privacy/tia-bill2004-sc.html


add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 2 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
so much for freedom savehighered Thursday December 09, 2004 at 10:34 PM
Brer rabbit says... BR Thursday December 09, 2004 at 06:47 AM
Melbourne Indymedia is a website produced by grassroots media makers offering non-corporate coverage of struggles, actions and celebrations. Everyone is a witness. Everyone is a journalist.
N© Melbourne Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Melbourne Independent Media Center.