calendar >>>
add an event >>>
features
   anti-war
   migration
   climate change
   ecology
   students
   work
   health
   gender
   culture
   indymedia
   global news
   anti-nuclear
   anti-racism
   civil liberties
   anti-corporate
   miscellaneous
   social movements

 

announcements list
contributors list

about us
   contact
   get involved
   support us
   editorial policy

resources
   activist groups
   syndication
   links

radio
podcast

engagemedia

search


themes
   white theme black theme




 

 

 


printable version - email this article

Professor ‘unreservedly’ apologies for false accusation against police DNA scientists.
by Jeff Clement Thursday December 18, 2003 at 10:05 AM

A champion of the anti DNA lobby humbly retracts his allegations that Victorian police deliberately contaminated exhibits in the Jaiden Leskie case.

Readers may recall an article by DNA Info a couple of weeks ago which called into question the use of DNA evidence in criminal trials. Selective information from a television documentary comprised the bulk of the ‘evidence’ to justify their claim that police were planting DNA evidence on suspects in order to secure convictions. Astute readers will also recall that no actual evidence was produced to support this claim. Just plenty of allegations.

A champion of DNA Info’s cause was one Professor Barry Boethcher, a former biology professor at Newcastle University. Bazz had alleged that police at the Victorian Forensic Science Center had deliberately contaminated the DNA sample found on Jaiden Leskie’s clothing. Serious stuff indeed. The good professor expressed hope that he would be summoned to appear before the coroner investigating Jaiden’s murder so that he could expound his theories in the public domain and bring to light a disgraceful episode in Victorian policing history.

Well, dear readers, the professor got his wish. He received his summons, duly presented himself before a video camera for a link to the court and….promptly offered ‘unreserved’ apologies to the scientists he had wrongly accused of deliberate contamination. You see folks, the good professor had made the mistake many armchair critics often do in cases involving the police; he opened his trap before apprising himself of all the facts. No doubt the learned proff would deduct marks from a student’s essay for such shoddy research and preparation. He expressed an uninformed opinion, which like an arsehole, most people have but few are interested in seeing. After reading all relevant documentation, you see, he realized his big mistake. He had spoken from an uniformed position. Ballistic podiatry I think it’s called. Shooting one self in the foot.

Questioned if there was any evidence (you know, DNA Info, that awful word that keeps rearing its ugly head) of deliberetae contamination, Professor Boetcher bowed his head and replied, No. None at all.

Case dismissed. Next!

DNA Info, you are like many people at this year’s Melbourne Cup. You backed the wrong horse. And did your cause no good at all.




add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 7 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
NATIONAL INQUIRY IN DNA STUFFUPS NEEDED Clare Johnson Friday May 07, 2004 at 07:51 PM
DNA should never have been seen as infallible DNA Info Friday December 26, 2003 at 07:41 PM
Arrogance is no substitute for the real world karl Pentel Tuesday December 23, 2003 at 12:37 AM
So when will Clements unreservedly apologise DNA Info Friday December 19, 2003 at 05:24 PM
Not so fast pr Thursday December 18, 2003 at 10:24 AM
Melbourne Indymedia is a website produced by grassroots media makers offering non-corporate coverage of struggles, actions and celebrations. Everyone is a witness. Everyone is a journalist.
N© Melbourne Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Melbourne Independent Media Center.