calendar >>>
> Forum - A Road to P…
> Forum - A Road to P…
> Forum - A Road to P…
> Forum - A Road to P…
> e0bkvr3lms
add an event >>>
features
   anti-war
   migration
   climate change
   ecology
   students
   work
   health
   gender
   culture
   indymedia
   global news
   anti-nuclear
   anti-racism
   civil liberties
   anti-corporate
   miscellaneous
   social movements

 

announcements list
contributors list

about us
   contact
   get involved
   support us
   editorial policy

resources
   activist groups
   syndication
   links

radio
podcast

engagemedia

search


themes
   white theme black theme




 

 

 


printable version - email this article

Crean backs war criminals
by A Bird In The Hand Wednesday October 15, 2003 at 03:11 PM
gkable@hotmail.com

I have a problem with members standing. I have a problem with that, I doubt if I’ll be the most enthusiastic knocker outside the chamber at the time but as far as I’m concerned to focus on these issues is exactly the point. I think you call it leading by example. In this case the blind leading the blind.

Crean backs war crim...
hdnolaw.jpg, image/jpeg, 435x243

The Federal Labor leader, Simon Crean, has tried to head off planned protests by some opposition MPs when the US President addresses Parliament next week.

Can you believe it? This is a person who has seen the dead or ought to go to Iraq and visit the morgue to see the dead.

Mr Crean has told Labor MPs he expects them to treat George W Bush with respect and dignity.

Hey rocky let me pull respect and dignity out of my pocket! Correct me if I am wrong but I think you have to earn respect and dignity.

Some Labor MPs are strongly opposed to President Bush's address to a joint sitting of Parliament and that’s why federal Labor can’t win an election. No solidarity! One MP plans to wear a white arm band to indicate his opposition to the Iraq war.

In a caucus meeting today, Mr Crean told MPs courtesy should always be extended to invited guests. He said members should listen respectfully and at the end of the speech make an appropriate acknowledgment.

But war criminals shouldn’t be invited to this country isn’t there a law that prevents war criminals visiting Australia. Does that mean if you’re a war criminal with plenty of money its okay? Or John Howard is a war criminal and George Bush’s Co-offender so it’s okay?

MPs were told a precedent was set when Bill Clinton was given a standing ovation after he addressed the Parliament in 1996. One backbencher responded saying a standing ovation for President Bush would be "over the top". No! Under the table.

Mr Crean's office says the Opposition leader thinks they should applaud at the end of the speech and then stand as the President leaves the chamber. A good reason why Simon Crean should never be elected as Prime Minister.

The Greens say Australians will be excluded from the public gallery when President Bush and the Chinese leader give their addresses.

Senator Bob Brown says MPs can invite guests and there are now no seats left for the general public.

"The gallery belongs to the public, the public should be allowed in there," he said.

"The simple way here would be a ballot of applicants and the public could ballot for an opportunity, on these special occasions as the Prime Minister puts it, to hear heads of visiting foreign powers."

A Federal Labor frontbencher says any protest by Opposition MPs, when the United States President addresses the Parliament next week, would be inappropriate theatrics.

Lindsay Tanner says while he is also a strong critic of the US President, he accepts the view of Mr Crean that any visiting head of state should be treated with respect.

"As far as I'm concerned, if it is appropriate for the entry and exit of the President to be acknowledged by members standing I don't have problem with doing that, I doubt if I'll be the most enthusiastic applauder in the chamber at the time but as far as I'm concerned to focus on these minor theatrics is completely beside the point," he said.

THE MONGREL: Perhaps a funeral march would be appropriate theatrics listing the dead in Iraq. Respect is something given when something is due.

Does that mean Simon Crean is harbouring war criminal? Isn’t that an offence?

As far as I’m concerned if it is inappropriate and illegal for the entry and exit of a war criminal whether that person is a President of the US or Guantanamo Bay.

I have a problem with members standing. I have a problem with that, I doubt if I’ll be the most enthusiastic knocker outside the chamber at the time but as far as I’m concerned to focus on these issues is exactly the point. I think you call it leading by example. In this case the blind leading the blind.

add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 3 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
Get his name right Kimmoi B. Sunday October 19, 2003 at 08:26 PM
Crean sux Maybe ex-Labor Supporter Sunday October 19, 2003 at 07:20 PM
Crean Bought & Paid for? govinda Wednesday October 15, 2003 at 08:47 PM
Melbourne Indymedia is a website produced by grassroots media makers offering non-corporate coverage of struggles, actions and celebrations. Everyone is a witness. Everyone is a journalist.
N© Melbourne Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Melbourne Independent Media Center.